Japan’s clinical trial transformation: Building a global future
Japan is known for strong scientific expertise and high-quality data, and is home to the world’s fourth largest pharmaceutical market.1 However, its clinical trial ecosystem has long presented challenges. Factors, such as complex operational requirements, lengthy review times and misalignment with global standards, among others, have led to relatively low participation in global clinical trials.
Japan has also been struggling against drug lag and drug loss, in which new drugs that have been approved in other countries have experienced developmental delay or have not yet been developed domestically. This problem is particularly pronounced in paediatric and orphan diseases, since the relevant populations are relatively small.
In recent years, Japan has begun working to counteract drug lag and loss, and modernise its approach to clinical trials.Through a variety of reforms, it aims to establish a globally aligned, efficient and sustainable clinical trial ecosystem that supports simultaneous global development and delivers innovative therapies to patients without delay. Here, we explore some of these changes and why they are making Japan a more attractive choice for clinical trials.
MRCT reform
Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs), studies that are conducted across several countries or regions under a single protocol, are a central mechanism of global drug development. As part of its efforts to combat drug loss, Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) has prioritised creating an environment for MRCTs that aligns more closely with global regulatory expectations.
A key element of this alignment is a notification published in December of 2023, which addressed the previously maintained requirement that, for an MRCT to take place in Japan, it must be preceded by a Phase I trial consisting of Japanese participants.2 Under the revised guidance, the need for a study involving Japanese participants prior to an MRCT can be assessed on a case-by-case basis using criteria such as the safety profile of the study drug and the likelihood that ethnic factors will affect its safety and efficacy.3 If these risks are low, an early trial with Japanese participants may not be necessary, lowering a major barrier to conducting MRCTs in Japan.
Accelerated pathways
To encourage drug development and provide faster market access, Japan has implemented and continued investing in several accelerated approval pathways. One of these is the Sakigake Designation System, which promotes innovative new medical products for the treatment of severe illness, and functions similarly to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Breakthrough Therapy Designation and the European Medicines Agency’s Priority Medicines scheme.4 It supports development through measures such as prioritised consultation with the PMDA, evaluation of documents prior to application and regulatory review within 6 months, compared to 9 months for priority review or 12 months for standard review.
Another accelerated pathway is the Conditional Early Approval System, which was established to put highly effective drugs for serious disease into practical use as early as possible.5 Under this system, drugs demonstrating a certain degree of safety and efficacy may receive conditional approval without confirmatory trials, although safety and efficacy must later be reexamined in the post-market setting. To qualify, a drug must demonstrate superiority over existing treatments for a serious disease, and confirmatory clinical trials must be difficult or impractical to conduct due to factors such as a limited number of patients.
Extensive consultation systems
A further key element supporting Japan’s clinical trial ecosystem is the PMDA’s extensive consultation framework. This framework helps to de-risk and streamline clinical trials by giving sponsors the opportunity to receive guidance and advice on clinical trials, and data for regulatory submissions.6 Recent efforts have increased the availability of consultations for key groups.
In July of 2024, the Consultation Center for Pediatric and Orphan Drug Development was established to promote drug development in paediatric and orphan diseases through scientific guidance, as these areas are particularly impacted by drug loss.7 That same year, the PMDA began establishing overseas offices in locations including Thailand and the US to disseminate regulatory information and support startups based outside Japan.7,8 For sponsors unfamiliar with the Japanese regulatory landscape, these initiatives facilitate better preparation for late-stage clinical trials and help create more predictable review timelines.
Benefits of a renewed ecosystem
Efforts to improve the clinical trial ecosystem have numerous benefits for many different stakeholders. For global sponsors, the reduced need for Japanese-specific early phase data lowers barriers to entry. In general, MRCT-friendly policies are increasing alignment with global drug development timelines and practices, making the implementation of such trials much smoother.
For the Japanese health system, in addition to reducing drug loss, these changes lead to easier participation in overseas-led global trials, expanding access to innovative molecules. For Japanese sponsors, they provide the opportunity to scale internationally by using MRCTs as a global launch platform. Furthermore, the regulatory flexibility introduced through these reforms reduces the cost burden for smaller Japanese biotechs, allowing them to flourish.
A promising future
Japan’s focus on repositioning has begun to build local industry momentum. Its participation in MRCTs has continued to rise, and exceeded 60% of all trials in Japan starting in 2021, confirming a more globally compatible environment.9 In 2025, 24 drugs with new active ingredients had been approved as of September, indicating a healthy inflow of new drug product submissions.10 With global and domestic sponsors alike currently pursuing high-value programs in Japan, the country has become an increasingly attractive destination for clinical trials.
References
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. “Why Japan Should Be on Your Map for Medical Innovation.” PMDA Updates, Summer 2025. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000276746.pdf
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. “Basic principles for conducting phase 1 studies in Japanese prior to initiating multi-regional clinical trials including Japan for drugs in which early clinical development is preceding outside Japan.” Notification No. 1225-2. 25 Dec., 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000266727.pdf
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. “Q&A for basic principles for conducting phase 1 studies in Japanese prior to initiating multi-regional clinical trials including Japan for drugs in which early clinical development is preceding outside Japan.” 25 Dec., 2023. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000266728.pdf
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. “Strategy of SAKIGAKE by MHLW.” https://www.pmda.go.jp/english/review-services/reviews/advanced-efforts/0001.html. Accessed 18 May 2026.
- Inoue, S. “Regulatory Update from MHLW/PMDA.” 5th Joint Conference of Taiwan and Japan on Medical Products Regulation. 1 Dec., 2017. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000221880.pdf
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. “Consultations.” https://www.pmda.go.jp/english/review-services/consultations/0002.html. Accessed 18 May 2026.
- Kohno, Yoichi, et al. “Expediting Drug Development in Japan: A PMDA Perspective.” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 118, no. 6, Dec. 2025, pp. 1262–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70022.
- Otsubo, Yasuto. “PMDA Initiatives to Enhance Drug Development via Multi-Regional Clinical Trials.” Translational and Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 32, no. 4, 2024, p. 173. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2024.32.e16.
- “Regulatory Process Overview – ACTUAL RESULTS.” Japan CRO Association, https://www.jcroa.or.jp/english/actual-results/. Accessed 18 May 2026.
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. “List of Approved Drugs April 2004 to September 2025.” https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000279952.pdf. Accessed 18 May 2026.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
- mHealth wearables
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
-
Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
- Partnership insights
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel