Navigating the EU Packaging & Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR)
Implications for pharmaceutical labelling and beyond
The European Union’s Packaging & Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) represents one of the most significant regulatory shifts in decades for companies placing products on the EU market. With applicability from 12 August 2026, this regulation introduces far-reaching changes to packaging design, labelling and lifecycle management, with particular implications for the pharmaceutical sector.
In this article, we explore the background to PPWR, its key provisions, the operational impact on life sciences companies and ICON’s recommendations to support early and effective compliance.
Background: Why PPWR is happening
The PPWR (Regulation (EU) 2025/40) was introduced as part of the EU’s broader Green Deal and Circular Economy Action Plan, reflecting the growing urgency to address packaging waste and resource inefficiency.
Packaging is a major environmental concern: it accounts for a significant share of raw material consumption and municipal waste in the EU, with volumes continuing to rise. At the same time, fragmented national regulations have created complexity and barriers within the single market, increasing costs and compliance risks for industry.
The PPWR therefore aims to:
- Reduce packaging waste and environmental impact
- Promote recyclability, reuse and circularity
- Harmonise requirements across all EU Member States
- Improve transparency through standardised labelling
Unlike the previous, Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (94/62/EC), the PPWR is a directly applicable regulation, ensuring a single, consistent framework across Europe.
Key highlights: What the regulation covers
The PPWR is a comprehensive framework spanning the entire packaging lifecycle, from design and manufacture through to disposal and recycling.
ICON’s internal assessment highlights three core pillars:
1. Sustainable packaging requirements
Packaging must meet strict sustainability criteria, including:
- Minimisation of substances of concern (e.g. PFAS)
- Mandatory recyclability standards
- Minimum recycled content targets for plastics from 2030 onwards
- Reduction of weight and volume to the minimum necessary by 2030
2. Labelling, marking and information requirements
A major operational shift will be the introduction of harmonised EU-wide labelling:
- From 12 August 2028 (or 24 months after implementing acts), all packaging must carry a harmonised label showing material composition to support consumer sorting
- Label must use pictograms, be easy to understand and also accessible for people with disabilities
- Optional QR codes may provide additional sorting instructions for each component
- Packaging containing substances of concern requires digital marking
For reusable packaging:
- From 12 February 2029 (or 30 months after implementing acts)
- “Reusable” labelling is required
- QR codes must provide reuse system details
3. Technical and digital requirements
The regulation introduces new expectations around:
- Standardised claims for recycled or biobased content
- Strict rules on label placement, visibility and legibility
- Prohibition of misleading sustainability claims
Impact: What this means for pharma and life sciences
The PPWR applies broadly to all packaging placed on the EU market, regardless of material or origin and across all economic operators — including manufacturers, importers and distributors.
For pharmaceutical companies, the implications are particularly complex.
Operational and regulatory impact
ICON’s analysis identifies several key challenges:
- Packaging redesign across cartons, blisters, bottles and leaflets
- Increased regulatory burden, including potential variations and stability studies
- Artwork complexity, due to additional pictograms and sustainability information
- Supplier and material challenges, including requalification and audits
- Data governance requirements for packaging composition and compliance
- Risk of supply disruption if transitions are not aligned
Pharmaceutical packaging must also continue to meet strict requirements for patient safety, stability and sterility, which can limit redesign flexibility and create tension with sustainability targets.
Key milestones and timelines
| Requirement | Implementation deadline |
| PPWR becomes applicable | 12 August 2026 |
| Harmonised packaging labelling (including pictograms) | 12 August 2028 |
| Reusable packaging labelling | 12 February 2029 |
| Methodology for substances of concern | 2030 onwards |
The phased approach means that labelling changes in 2028 and 2029 will likely drive early transformation programmes, particularly given long pharmaceutical change timelines.
ICON’s recommendations for sponsors and clients
At ICON, we view PPWR not as a standalone regulatory change, but as a strategic transformation across the product lifecycle.
1. Start early with impact assessments
Companies should:
- Conduct portfolio-wide packaging audits
- Identify high-risk SKUs and constrained formats
- Map labelling and data gaps against PPWR requirements
Early assessment is critical given long regulatory and supply chain lead times.
2. Align packaging changes with regulatory strategy
- Integrate PPWR changes into existing variation and lifecycle management plans
- Synchronise updates with regulatory submission cycles
3. Strengthen cross-functional governance
PPWR cuts across multiple functions. Successful implementation requires:
- Alignment between Regulatory Affairs, Labelling, Quality, Packaging Engineering and Sustainability
- Centralised decision-making and data governance frameworks
4. Engage suppliers proactively
- Assess supplier readiness and material availability
- Initiate requalification activities early
- Mitigate risk of non-compliant or unavailable materials
5. Prepare for digital and data requirements
- Establish robust packaging data management systems
- Plan for QR code integration and digital labelling content
- Ensure compliance with pre-purchase information requirements
Conclusion
The PPWR marks a fundamental shift in packaging regulation across the EU, with far-reaching implications for pharmaceutical labelling, supply chains and regulatory strategy.
While timelines extend to 2028, 2029 and beyond, the complexity of implementation particularly for regulated products means action must begin now.
ICON supports clients across the full lifecycle of regulatory labelling and packaging transformation, from early impact assessment through to implementation and market compliance, helping organisations navigate PPWR with confidence and maintain continuity of supply in an evolving regulatory landscape. If you would like to know more about how to navigate the impact of PPWR, please contact our team at RCSLabeling@iconplc.com.
References
- Regulation (EU) 2025/40 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 2024 on packaging and packaging waste. Eur-Lex. Published January 22, 2025
- European Commission. Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation. Accessed May 2026
- Latham & Watkins LLP. European Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation: Summary of provisions and new guidance. April 24, 2026
- Complir. PPWR Explained: What the EU’s new packaging regulation means. April 26, 2026
- DDReg Pharma. From Waste to Worth: Aligning Your Packaging Strategy with the EU PPWR. June 24, 2025
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
- mHealth wearables
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
- Infectious Diseases
-
NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
-
Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
- Partnership insights
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel