Why Japan is a global destination for regenerative medicine
Through recent regulatory and policy reforms, Japan is becoming an increasingly attractive location for clinical research and development programmes, particularly in regenerative medicine. Although these reforms aim to modernise clinical trials, Japan has already established itself as a leader and prime destination in this fast-growing field.
Focused on the restoration, repair or formation of structures or functions in the human body, regenerative medicine is a broad discipline. It uses approaches, including tissue engineering, cell and gene therapies, medical devices and artificial organs, to replace or heal damaged tissues.
Because this approach to medicine is inherently complex, its development needs and regulatory landscape can be equally difficult to navigate. With a large potential participant pool, well-established regulatory pathways supported by more than a decade of experience, national health insurance resources and alignment with global standards, Japan stands out in its ability to support regenerative medicine.
A relevant patient population
Japan’s population is ageing, with approximately 29% over the age of 65 as of October 2023.1 When people get older, they become susceptible to diseases and conditions with limited treatment options, including neurological, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal and metabolic degeneration. Consequently, this demographic is facing a rise in unmet medical needs.
Regenerative medicine has great potential to address age-related disease by restoring the structure and function of damaged tissue, providing an improved quality of life for older patients.2,3 Many therapies in this area are designed either to expand treatment options for age-related conditions or to alleviate disorders that frequently affect older adults. As a result, regenerative medicine is highly relevant to a significant portion of Japan’s population, giving research in this area a sizeable pool of potential patients for study enrolment.
Established regulatory pathways
Since 2014, Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency has implemented a regulatory framework to support the advancement of regenerative medicine. The Act on the Safety of Regenerative Medicine, enacted in November 2014, instituted legal requirements for research and clinical use of cell therapies.4
In parallel, the Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, and Other Therapeutic Products Act established the pathway governing the commercialisation of regenerative medical products.5 Together, these acts provide a clear structure for product development and regulatory review. They also demonstrate that, with more than a decade of experience, Japanese regulators already have a strong understanding of the field.
More recently, Japan released guidance in 2024 for the conditional and time-limited approval of regenerative medical products.6 It aims to increase the predictability of approval applications and support development in this area. Under this pathway, if a product’s safety is confirmed and its efficacy is reasonably predicted from early-stage trials, it may receive conditional approval, with full approval contingent on demonstrating efficacy within a defined post-marketing timeframe. In addition to allowing earlier market entry without waiting for the completion of lengthy efficacy studies, the approach enables patients to access therapies sooner, a meaningful advantage when conventional treatments are insufficient.
National health insurance
A significant benefit to regenerative medicine developers in Japan is its universal health insurance coverage. On a basic level, widespread access to health insurance means coverage of routine care costs, meaning that many services over the course of the trial will be reimbursable and, as a result, costs to the sponsor will be lower.
Even more compelling, because coverage is universal, nearly all healthcare interactions in Japan are captured as insurance claims. This data feeds into the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), which compiles claims and checkup data from all Japanese insurers. Estimated to hold approximately 98% of all medical data on healthcare services provided by medical institutions within the country, the NDB is a massive repository of real-world data.7
Because much regenerative medicine, in particular cell and gene therapies, requires lengthy follow-up, the NDB is an invaluable tool for monitoring safety and efficacy after a therapy reaches the market. Its unified data collection structure, which includes virtually all Japanese patients, helps solve common challenges in tracking patients over many years and in working with fragmented data. There have been multiple cases of NDB data being used to help support regulatory decisions regarding post-market drug safety.8
Aligning with global development
In addition to the characteristics outlined above, Japan has been aligning its broader clinical trial ecosystem with international standards. Reforms to multi-regional clinical trial requirements, for example, have made Japan-based development programmes more appealing to sponsors worldwide. Together, these changes position Japan as an early access market, one that can generate clinical and commercial validation for regenerative therapies ahead of large-scale global expansion.
References
- Statistics Bureau Home Page/Population Estimates/Current Population Estimates as of October 1, 2023. https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/jinsui/2023np/index.html. Accessed 6 July 2026.
- Yamada, Satsuki, et al. “Cell Therapy Improves Quality-of-Life in Heart Failure: Outcomes From a Phase III Clinical Trial.” Stem Cells Translational Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, Nov. 2023, pp. 116–24. PubMed Central, https://doi.org/10.1093/stcltm/szad078.
- Sinclair, Wynnet, et al. “Examining the Relationship between Stem Cell Treatment and Quality of Life in Recipients with Knee Conditions.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 42, June 2025, pp. 452–62. DOI.org (Crossref), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.12.040.
- Regenerative Medical Products.” Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, https://www.pmda.go.jp/english/review-services/reviews/0003.html. Accessed 6 July 2026.
- Act on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products Including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices - Japanese/English - Japanese Law Translation. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/3213. Accessed 6 July 2026.
- Guidance for Conditional and Time-Limited Approval for Regenerative Medical Products and the Development of Subsequent Efficacy Evaluation Plan. Accessed 6 July 2026. https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000274350.pdf
- Yasunaga, Hideo. “Updated Information on NDB.” Annals of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 6, no. 3, June 2024, pp. 73–76. PubMed Central, https://doi.org/10.37737/ace.24011.
- Shida, Haruka, et al. “Use of National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups for Examining Practical Utilization and Safety Signal of a Drug to Support Regulatory Assessment on Postmarketing Drug Safety in Japan.” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 10, Feb. 2023, p. 1096992. PubMed Central, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1096992.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
- mHealth wearables
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Global regulatory strategies for immunology
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
- Infectious Diseases
-
NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
-
Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
- Partnership insights
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel