Italy’s new serialisation framework: navigating the transition to a hybrid model
Italy is entering a pivotal phase in pharmaceutical traceability. With the introduction of Decreto Legislativo n. 10 del 6 febbraio 2025, the country is reshaping its long-standing national system to align more closely with the European Union’s Falsified Medicines Directive (EU FMD), specifically Regulation (EU) 2016/161, which supplements Directive 2001/83/EC, while preserving elements of its established security infrastructure.
For sponsors and marketing authorisation holders, this is not a routine regulatory update. It is a multi-dimensional transformation affecting packaging, supply chains, data management and regulatory compliance.
Why is the framework changing?
Italy has historically operated one of Europe’s most robust national traceability systems, centred on the Bollino, a uniquely Italian security feature applied to medicinal packs.
While highly effective in preventing counterfeiting, this national system has operated in parallel to the EU FMD, which introduced harmonised requirements across Member States, including unique identifiers and verification through the European Medicines Verification System (EMVS).
The new legislation reflects a strategic shift. Its objectives are threefold:
- Strengthen supply chain security through harmonised EU mechanisms
- Enable interoperability with EU-wide verification systems
- Ensure continuity of the existing Italian safeguards during transition
The result is a hybrid model, designed to bridge national and European approaches without disrupting market supply.
What does the new regulation introduce?
Replacement of the Bollino
A key change is the progressive replacement of the Bollino with the Carta Valori, a secure value-based label produced by the Italian State Printing Office (Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato). Unlike a simple sticker, Carta Valori is a controlled security document with enhanced anti-counterfeiting features and centralised production.
EU-compliant pack requirements
Outer packaging must now include:
- A 2D DataMatrix encoding:
- GTIN
- Serial number
- Batch/lot number
- Expiry date
- Italian AIC code
- Human-readable data elements
- An anti-tampering device (ATD)
These requirements align Italy with broader EU FMD standards while retaining country-specific identifiers.
Timeline and key milestones
The legislation introduces a phased implementation:
-
2025
February 2025: Entry into force
-
2026
2025 to February 2027: Transition period with dual systems
-
2027
From February 2027: Full application of EU FMD requirements
During the transition, companies must ensure that packs comply with both EU and Italian requirements, increasing operational complexity.
What is the impact on industry?
Who is affected?
The regulation applies to:
- Marketing authorisation holders
- Manufacturers and contract manufacturing organisations (CMOs)
- Packaging sites supplying the Italian market
- Supply chain and distribution partners
Operational implications
The shift to a hybrid model introduces several challenges:
- Packaging and artwork redesign : Artwork must be adapted to include additional data elements and accommodate both the DataMatrix and national security features.
- Packaging line modifications : Production lines may require upgrades to handle variable data printing, additional data fields, and physical application of Carta Valori labels.
- Increased data management complexity : Data must be uploaded to the EU hub, validated, and transmitted to the Italian system. This creates a critical dependency on data accuracy and system connectivity.
- Reliance on national suppliers : The availability of Carta Valori introduces a dependency on centralised production and distribution, with potential risks to supply timelines.
Industry feedback indicates that serialisation in Italy is already seen as a significant operational pain point, reflecting the scale of the transformation.
What actions should sponsors take now?
To remain compliant and minimise disruption, early and structured preparation is essential. Key actions include:
- Identify products and sites supplying Italy
- Assess current serialisation capabilities against EU FMD requirements
- Review and update packaging configurations and artwork
- Validate production line readiness
- Ensure alignment of master data and connectivity to EMVS
- Engage early with CMOs and supply partners
- Monitor evolving national guidance and pilot programs
Participation in pilot phases and market testing is particularly valuable, enabling early identification of gaps and influencing implementation through feedback loops.
ICON perspective: Practical recommendations for pharma companies
At ICON, we see this transition as both a compliance obligation and an opportunity to strengthen labelling and supply chain strategies.
1. Start early and prioritise Italy
Italy should be treated as a priority market given the scale of change and operational impact. Delayed planning increases the risk of bottlenecks as multiple companies compete for limited implementation capacity.
2. Take an integrated approach
Serialisation is not solely a regulatory activity. Success depends on alignment across:
Regulatory Affairs
Packaging and artwork
Supply chain
Quality and IT
Cross-functional governance is critical.
3. Build flexibility into packaging design
During the transition, packaging must accommodate evolving requirements. Designing adaptable artwork and layouts will help reduce rework and future-proof packs.
4. Strengthen data governance
Data quality and consistency are central to EU FMD compliance. Sponsors should establish robust controls to ensure accurate, validated data flows through the EU hub and national systems.
5. Mitigate supply chain risk
Engage early with suppliers of Carta Valori and packaging components. Build contingencies to manage potential delays or capacity constraints.
6. Leverage pilot programs
Active participation in pilots and testing phases provides valuable insights and allows companies to shape implementation through direct feedback to authorities and stakeholders.
How ICON can support
ICON supports clients through every stage of this transition, including:
- Regulatory intelligence and interpretation of Italian requirements
- Portfolio and supply chain impact assessments
- Artwork and labelling strategy
- Risk-based implementation planning
- Coordination across global and local stakeholders
Our approach is grounded in practical experience, combining regulatory expertise with operational insight to deliver compliant and sustainable solutions.
Conclusion
Italy’s revised serialisation framework represents a significant evolution in pharmaceutical traceability. The hybrid model introduces complexity but also aligns Italy more closely with European standards while preserving its strong national safeguards.
For sponsors, success will depend on early planning, cross-functional collaboration and proactive engagement with the evolving system.
ICON continues to monitor developments closely and support clients in navigating this transition with confidence.
ICON supports clients across the full lifecycle of regulatory labelling and packaging transformation, from early impact assessment through to implementation and market compliance, helping organisations navigate regulatory changes with confidence in an evolving regulatory landscape. If you would like to know more about how to navigate the impact of the serialisation changes, please contact our team at RCSLabeling@iconplc.com.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
- mHealth wearables
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Global regulatory strategies for immunology
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
- Infectious Diseases
-
NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
-
Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
- Partnership insights
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel