
Melvin G. Fletcher III
On December 26, 2017, the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research announced a proposed programme for publishing certain device malfunction medical device reports (MDRs) in summary form on a quarterly basis, instead of filing each individual MDR within 30 days. The programme - referred to as the Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program for Manufacturers - is under a comment period until Feb. 26, 2018.
The goal is to streamline malfunction reporting. As a consequence, the programme will:
- Require Electronic Medical Device Reporting (eMDR)
- Change the timing of malfunction MDRs in certain cases
- Amend MDR number requirements
This programme was outlined in the commitment letter agreed to by the FDA and the medical device industry, and submitted to Congress, as referenced in the Medical Device User Fee Amendments Act of 2017 (MDUFA IV Commitment Letter). In addition, this proposed programme reflects findings from an FDA pilot study on summary reporting formats for malfunction MDRs.
Every year the FDA receives hundreds of thousands of MDRs of suspected device-associated deaths, serious injuries, and malfunctions. The FDA's MDR programme is one of the post-market surveillance tools the FDA uses to monitor device performance, detect potential device-related safety issues, and contribute to benefit-risk assessments. Malfunction reports represent a substantial fraction of the MDRs the FDA receives on an annual basis.
Under the programme, manufacturers submitting summary malfunction reports would be required to use eMDR. (To submit these reports, follow the schedule in the table below.)
Reportable malfunctions that you become aware of during these time frames: | Must be submitted to FDA by: |
January 1- March 31, 2018 | April 30, 2018 |
April 1- June 30, 2018 | July 31, 2018 |
July 1- September 30, 2018 | October 31, 2018 |
October 1- December 31, 2018 | January 31, 2019 |
Moreover, the summary malfunction report requires a MDR number that consists of:
- The registration number of the manufacturer
- The four-digit calendar year in which the event is being reported
- The last five digits, with the first report of each year having the sequence number 00001.
In addition, for combination products that include a device constituent part and that received marketing authorization under a biological product or drug marketing application, the FDA seeks comments on whether a different reporting schedule would be more appropriate.
MDR reportable event needing remedial action
While the proposed programme allows for filing MDRs on a quarterly basis, the reporting requirements of FDA 21 CFR Part 803.53 would continue to apply to manufacturers.
Under FDA 21 CFR Part 803.53(a), for example, a five-day report must be filed if a manufacturer becomes aware of a MDR reportable event that necessitates remedial action to prevent an unreasonable risk of substantial harm to public health.
In addition, after a five-day report is submitted, all subsequent reportable malfunctions of the same nature that involve substantially similar devices must be submitted as individual MDRs in compliance with FDA 21 CFR Part 803.50 and 803.52 until 90 days past the date that the remedial action has been resolved to the FDA's satisfaction. Summary reporting of malfunctions may then resume on the regularly scheduled summary reporting cycle.
If the FDA has made a written request for the submission of a five-day report, the manufacturer must submit it, without further requests, for all subsequent reportable malfunctions of the same nature that involve substantially similar devices for the period specified. The FDA may extend the period stated in the original written request if the agency determines it is in the interest of public health (see FDA 21 CFR Part 803.53(b)).
Submission of reportable malfunctions associated with five-day reports would allow the FDA to monitor the time course and resolution of the issue presenting an unreasonable risk of substantial harm to public health.
How to submit a comment
- File electronically at https://www.regulations.gov until midnight Eastern Time by February 26, 2018.
- For written/paper submissions by mail or courier, address to: Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Comments received by mail/hand delivery/courier will be considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service acceptance receipt is on or before February 26, 2018.
Please note that late, untimely filed comments will not be considered by the FDA. In addition, all submissions received must include the following: Docket No. FDA-2017-N-6730 for “Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program for Manufacturers.”
Received comments that are filed in a timely manner will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as “Confidential Submissions,” will be publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov.
If you need assistance or have any questions with compliance issues regarding the Voluntary Malfunction Summary Reporting Program for Manufacturers, contact ICON at www.iconplc.com/sectors/medical-device for more information. Our medical device experts have experience with FDA submissions contained within this new programme.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
- EU Regulations
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
-
test insights page
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
-
Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
test insights page
-
Transforming Trials
-
Digitising COAs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Flexible delivery models
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Supporting a top 10 pharma to transition to Veeva Vault platform
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Digitising COAs
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
US payers and PROs
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel