In recent years the term artificial intelligence (AI) has become ubiquitous across multiple sectors including medicine. The first AI-enabled device received FDA approval in 1995, but it wasn’t until 2015 that it became more widely adopted. Between 2015 and March 2025 the FDA approved more than 1,000 AI-enabled devices. In this article we look at regulatory considerations for AI in software as a medical device.
What is AI?
AI refers to computer algorithms capable of complex reasoning, decision-making and even learning, which mimic human intelligence artificially. The intention of AI is to replicate human decision-making by rapidly evaluating complex and large quantities of data to improve the speed, consistency and accuracy of decision outcomes for the designed application. Perhaps AI’s greatest benefit: the ability to learn from real-world use and experience to improve its own performance.
How AI is being deployed in healthcare
AI-enabled medical devices are used most extensively in the field of imaging, specifically radiology. AI in medical imaging is integrated to quickly process large quantities of data and assist physicians to identify anomalies to better inform a patients’ diagnosis and/or treatment regime. Indeed, many of the recently approved AI-enabled medical devices with imaging applications are designed to detect and flag anomalies within a given type of imaging mode and within the specified indication (i.e. identifying an abnormal growth within a mammogram).
The second highest number of AI-enabled devices are in cardiovascular. The FDA recently gave De Novo authorisation for an at-home blood pressure monitor that simultaneously reads blood pressure and detects AFib. The device uses AI algorithms to read the pressure waves and detect irregularities. Robotics is an emerging field for AI-enabled devices, especially to aid preparing for, conducting or following up for surgery.
FDA regulatory considerations for embedding AI in medical devices
Despite the increasing number of AI-enabled medical devices the FDA has yet to establish a unique regulatory pathway for these devices. Most approvals follow a 510(k) pathway according to their risk level and similarity to a predicate device. The remaining approvals have been granted on a de novo basis. The FDA has recognised that traditional medical device regulations were not designed for AI-enabled devices and issued several guidance documents on regulatory submissions for the use of AI. The guidance emerged from joint discussions and research between multiple divisions of the FDA and feedback gathered outside the FDA.
The most recent FDA draft guidance from January 2025 proposes lifecycle management considerations and specific recommendations to support marketing submissions for AI-enabled medical devices.
As of August 2024 the FDA cleared 97% of AI-enabled devices via the 510(k) pathway. To follow this pathway applicants must prove their low to moderate risk device is substantially similar to a device already approved by the FDA (predicate device). During the same period, 22 AI-enabled low to moderate devices with no predicate went through de novo classification. Only four devices required the most rigorous premarket approval pathway as high risk devices.
For clinical decision support, if an AI-enabled device is used to make specific recommendations around a diagnosis or treatment then it falls under regulations. It is exempt from regulations if the AI-enabled device matches patient data with current treatment guidelines for common illnesses.
The FDA considers other factors when evaluating safety and effectiveness of algorithms in AI-enabled devices. These include data quality, robustness and clinical performance. AI-enabled devices must be validated and include an evaluation of appropriate study diversity based on the devices intended use and technological characteristics.
Conclusion
FDA approvals of AI in medical devices have increased rapidly in the past decade. AI offers medical device researchers new possibilities for innovation, improved accuracy and efficiency. Regulators have yet to catch up with the speed of adoption, and for now regulatory pathways depend on the level of associated risk and whether a predicate device exists. In early 2025 the FDA released draft guidance containing recommendations and considerations linked to the AI lifecycle. In the absence of a distinct regulatory pathway for AI-enabled devices, medical device researchers must plan their regulatory route to meet current requirements and anticipate future ones.
Download our whitepaper for a detailed examination of AI in SaMD and FDA regulations.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Behind Biotech: Stories of science and resilience
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel