The tides are turning for clinical trial monitoring. The recent publication of ICH E6(R3) marks a pivotal shift in how sponsors and CROs approach quality management. Rather than prescribing rigid processes, the guidance encourages innovation, adaptability, and a more strategic mindset. It opens the door for smarter, more integrated approaches to trial oversight, with risk-based quality management (RBQM) at the centre.
RBQM isn’t a one-size-fits-all checklist, it’s a dynamic, risk-proportionate framework for centralised, holistic trial oversight. When implemented early, RBQM enhances protocol design, clarifies endpoints and streamlines trial execution. In this blog, we explore how RBQM can drive value beyond compliance and help sponsors and CROs deliver more agile, efficient, participant-focused clinical studies.
Why ICH GCP E6(R3) matters now
The clinical trial landscape is more complex than ever. Global studies, decentralised models and evolving endpoints demand a more adaptive approach to quality and safety as risk levels vary widely between types and models of trials. The updates to ICH GCP E6(R3) reflect a regulatory-level consideration of this variation and represents the most significant update to the GCP guidelines since their original publication over 27 years ago. The R2 version in 2016 was the first to reference more risk-based approaches and addressed some of technology advancements to keep up with modern clinical practice. However, the R3 revision is more transformative.
ICH GCP E6 (R3) places greater emphasis on:
- identifying critical-to-quality (CtQ) factors early
- applying risk-proportionate, flexible quality management
- enabling continuous risk assessment and oversight
This shift sets a global regulatory precedent and gives sponsors and CROs more freedom to influence study design from the outset. It encourages collaboration across functions and supports a more strategic approach to trial planning.
Integrating QbD and RBQM early in study design
RBQM has the potential to shape protocol design. Protocol design has a broad range of impact across the clinical trial, meaning that even small details can have significant downstream impacts.
The release of ICH E6(R3), aligned with Quality by Design (QbD) principles, reinforces a critical shift in clinical development: the need to identify Critical to Quality (CtQ) factors and risks to participant safety and data reliability early in the trial lifecycle.
When risk assessments are embedded early, at the protocol feasibility and design stage, they bring cross-functional insights that help pre-empt common challenges—such as site feasibility issues, ambiguous endpoints, participant burden and enrolment hurdles. This proactive approach not only enhances trial design but also mitigates the risk of costly protocol amendments, which continue to be a major source of delays and financial strain across the industry.
RBQM plays a pivotal role in this transformation. This focus on risk-based approaches at earlier stages identifies critical data and processes that directly impact trial outcomes and enable:
- Simplification of overly complex protocols
- Better alignment between endpoints and operational feasibility
- Elimination of non-essential assessments that add burden without value
CROs with mature RBQM frameworks can deliver significant value at the protocol development phase. A team of cross-functional operational leads can evaluate protocols through the lens of feasibility and strategic alignment with insight into downstream execution efficiency. This early input supports faster study startup, mitigates the risk of mid-study disruptions, and reduces operational burden on sites.
Intelligent risk monitoring strategies
A proportionate, risk-based approach to monitoring is now a strategic necessity. Under the RBQM framework, monitoring evolves from static plans to dynamic strategies tailored to the protocol complexity and Critical to Quality (CtQ) factors—enabling smarter, more efficient oversight.
In place of 100% individual source data review (SDR) and source data verification (SDV), RBQM enables a targeted approach guided by early risk assessments and real-time central monitoring. Targeted SDR and SDV provides strategic overview of the risk landscape to then focus CRA efforts where oversight is most needed.
Regular quality and risk review meetings led by cross-functional teams foster shared learning, alignment and timely action. Integrated platforms and advanced data visualisation tools help detect emerging risks, clarify protocol issues and trigger early interventions where appropriate.
This approach to more holistic, tech-enabled monitoring facilitates a shift from reactive to proactive quality management for sponsors and CROs. More than just a compliance tool, intelligent risk monitoring enhances operational efficiency, optimises resource use and supports the delivery of agile, high-quality, participant-centric trials.
Future opportunities for RBQM
ICH E6(R3) acknowledges the role of technological advancement in clinical trials and in driving RBQM through scalable digital tools. As more data is captured outside traditional EDC through tools like eDiaries, eCOAs, ePROs and wearables, the traditional monitoring methods are no longer feasible or sufficient. Remote and centralised monitoring have become essential to ensure data quality and timely risk detection. Platforms like Clinical Data Studio unify disparate data streams, enabling a shared monitoring environment for real-time signal detection and faster, risk-informed decision-making.
AI tools, supported by human oversight, can help identify trends and risks earlier. This enables adaptive monitoring without increasing burden. As technology continues to evolve, the adoption of more intelligent digital platforms and predictive analytics will help visualise data risks and automate sampling decisions for targeted monitoring.
A shift in mindset
Regulatory and industry approaches to data monitoring are shifting. The final ICH GCP E6(R3) guidance encourages sponsors and CROs to adopt flexible, right-sized, risk proportionate approaches that are tailored to the needs of each trial. A bespoke RBQM strategy optimises monitoring and creates a ripple effect across the trial. It enhances protocol design, improves resource allocation, reduces operational burden by focusing on what matters most—protecting participant safety and data reliability.
To succeed, organisations need partners who understand change management and can support this shift in mindset. Starting RBQM early with cross-functional collaboration and the right technology to support informed decisions will drive overall trial success.
Connect with us to learn how tailored RBQM strategies can deliver optimised trials, higher visibility and more control from day one.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Behind Biotech: Stories of science and resilience
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel