After a slow adoption for many biotechs, Project Optimus is beginning to achieve its aims. Speaking on the BioCentury: This week podcast, ICON’s Dr Liz O’Brien, Senior Director, Drug Development Solutions assessed how biotechs have adapted to the FDA’s requirements on oncology dose-optimisation. She looked at how it fits in with regulatory requirements in other parts of the world and offers advice to biotechs to ensure they are set for success.
What is Project Optimus?
Launched in 2021, Project Optimus aims to ensure more accurate and appropriate dosing of oncology treatments. In the past there was a tendency towards leading with the highest tolerable dose and refining subsequent doses. Project Optimus makes oncology treatments more patient-centric, with developers tasked with finding the most appropriate dose before the drug enters the market.
Outside of oncology, dose-optimisation starting in drug development is the norm. The burden is on developers to define dosing in the early development of their treatment. Oncology developers, because of the huge unmet need for their treatments, were able to bring their products to market potentially sacrificing dose refinement for speed of access to innovation. For small oncology-focussed biotechs, this sea-change presents some initial challenges. There is limited precedent for this approach and, particularly for smaller companies, they may lack the necessary experience and bandwidth. Companies with prior commercialization experience and a global multiple therapy area footprint may innately have greater ability to adapt and embrace Optimus dose-optimisation requirements However, up to now biotech companies have not been doing the kind of post approval dose refinement clinical research that FDA Oncology Centre of Excellence Optimus aims to address, in early oncology drug development.
How are global regulatory agencies aligning with Optimus?
While Project Optimus is FDA Oncology Center of Excellence (OCE)-led, oncology drug development clinical trials by their nature are global and multi-regional.
“The beauty of oncology is that the patient pathway, the care pathway, treatment guidelines and clinical practice guidelines are very uniform globally,” O’Brien says.
Although agencies in other parts of the world don’t have the exact same framework as FDA OCE they are broadly aligned and receptive to dose-optimisation principles. For example, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published whitepapers on the subject. At the same time, the EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation (JCA – EU Joint Clinical Assessment ) has been implemented which is also focused on demonstrating comparative clinical effectiveness. Key stakeholders such as the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) endorsed the drive towards dose-optimisation, even before Project Optimus was formally published.
Next steps for biotechs
Biotechs with limited or no global commercialization experience or constrained inhouse expertise or resource do not have to go it alone. ICON Biotech helps to round out smaller biotech companies’ teams to provide strategic support. Biotechs may have insufficient bandwidth to cope with the requirements of post-marketing studies, medical affairs and investigator-initiated studies. Another challenge for biotechs is refining trial design for phase 3 studies. Beginning a phase 3 study without consulting relevant bodies is “navigating in the dark,” according to O’Brien. ICON Biotech provides strategic advice to ensure that companies maximise their consultations with regulatory agencies, resulting in better informed phase 3 study designs incorporating dose optimization from early development steps.
Conclusion
For smaller biotech companies, FDA’s Project Optimus represents more than a regulatory hurdle – it is a clinically meaningful initiative designed to ensure that innovative oncology drugs are dosed to maximise benefit while minimizing harm. By shifting focus from the highest tolerated dose to the most effective and patient-friendly dose, Optimus helps promising therapies to reach their full potential in the clinic and reduces the risk of drugs being withdrawn due to preventable toxicities. For biotechs, early adoption of these principles not only supports patients’ outcomes but also strengthens the long-term viability of their pipeline.
These challenges can be overcome with careful planning, consultations with regulatory agencies and external support from an experienced CRO.
Listen to the podcast episode
Partner with ICON Biotech to help you navigate complex trial design
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Behind Biotech: Stories of science and resilience
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel