Clinical development is entering a new era. Sponsors are facing increasing complexity in trial design, tighter timelines, and growing demands for cost effectiveness, speed, transparency and reproducibility.
At the same time, the tools used to support statistical analysis and programming are evolving. Among these, the adoption of R is emerging as a strategic priority.
R is not simply a programming language. It represents a shift in how the industry approaches data, collaboration, and innovation. Its open-source foundation enables flexibility, reproducibility, and community-driven development. These qualities are becoming essential as sponsors seek to modernise their clinical trial infrastructure.
The industry is moving forward
Across the pharmaceutical and biotech sectors, the use of R is steadily expanding. Sponsors are exploring its potential for exploratory analyses, quality checks, and full regulatory submissions.
Historically, organisations developed proprietary tools to address common challenges such as cost, speed, standardisation, and quality. Open-source changes this dynamic. Companies are now working together to build shared solutions that reduce duplication and improve overall quality. Initiatives like Pharmaverse exemplify this shift, offering curated packages for ADaM, SDTM, and TFL workflows1 that promote consistency and streamline reporting.
The move to open-source also removes the constraints of traditional licensing models, enabling scalability across teams and studies. More importantly, it empowers users to design tools that meet their specific needs, fostering innovation where generic solutions often fall short.
Adoption, however, varies. While some organisations are fully embracing R, others are taking incremental steps through hybrid models or pilot programs1. The key question is no longer whether to adopt R, but how to do so in a way that aligns with broader strategic goals.
The shift towards R should not be viewed merely as a technological switch. It reflects a broader cultural transformation that encourages collaboration and co-creation. It is about creating systems that are agile, transparent, and capable of supporting the demands of modern trials.
R is a powerful enabler of this change. Its success will depend on how it is adopted, scaled, and integrated into strategic workflows. For sponsors, the opportunity lies in approaching R not just as a tool, but as a catalyst for transformation.
R adoption requires more than code
Despite its advantages, adopting R at scale is not trivial. It requires infrastructure that supports reproducible workflows, training that builds internal capability, and governance that ensures compliance. Sponsors must consider how R fits into their broader data strategy, how it interacts with existing systems, and how it can be scaled across studies and teams.
This is where strategic partnerships become essential. The most successful transitions are not driven by tools alone, but by a clear vision for how programming can support faster insights, better decisions, and more efficient submissions.
ICON’s approach to R adoption
ICON supports sponsors in transitioning to R with confidence. Our Biostatistics and Programming team integrates R into clinical workflows to deliver scalable, reproducible, and interactive solutions. We combine R with SAS in a hybrid framework, enabling dynamic reporting through RMarkdown and interactive data exploration via Shiny.
Our proprietary platforms are designed to streamline programming, reduce manual effort, and ensure consistency across studies, and our R training environment enables rapid team scaling, reflecting our commitment to consistent delivery and effective change management. ICON’s approach is not just technical. It is strategic. We help sponsors align R adoption with their broader goals for innovation, compliance, and operational efficiency.
Partner with ICON to unlock the full potential of R in your clinical development programs.
Contact us today or visit ICONplc.com/biostats to learn more about our comprehensive biostatistics and programming solutions.
References:
- Knoph, A. & Farrugia, R. (2024). How R Pharma? An overview of industry adoption of R programming in clinical reporting. Presented at PHUSE EU Connect. Summary available via Pharmaverse: https://pharmaverse.org
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Behind Biotech: Stories of science and resilience
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel