The future of multiple sclerosis care: Progression focused therapies and real world evidence
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS) and can lead to significant disability over time. It remains the most common inflammatory neurological condition worldwide and in the United States alone, approximately one million people are living with MS.
Decades of drug development has yielded substantial advancements in suppressing inflammatory relapses, particularly for patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). However, focus has increasingly shifted towards slowing or preventing disability progression, especially in progressive forms of MS. This transition has important implications for pharmaceutical innovation, clinical development strategies, and health economics modelling—areas now increasingly shaped by real‑world data (RWD).
Demographics of newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis patients
Real‑world claims data highlight patients newly diagnosed with MS across age, sex, and ethnicity.
MS is most frequently diagnosed between the ages of 30 and 59, with peak incidence observed in individuals aged 40–59.
Females represent nearly three‑quarters of newly diagnosed MS patients, reinforcing the well‑established sex disparity observed in MS epidemiology.
While the majority of newly diagnosed patients are Caucasian, MS affects individuals across all racial and ethnic groups, underscoring the importance of inclusive research and treatment access.
Multiple sclerosis disease forms and clinical courses
MS is a heterogeneous disease characterised by clinical courses that are defined by how and when neurological damage accumulates.
- Clinically Isolated Syndrome (CIS): CIS represents the first clinical episode suggestive of MS, lasting at least 24 hours and driven by CNS inflammation and demyelination. Early diagnosis can help delay or prevent subsequent disease activity.
- Relapsing Remitting MS (RRMS): RRMS is marked by acute recurring relapses followed by periods of recovery and accounts for approximately 85% of initial MS diagnoses.
- Secondary Progressive MS (SPMS): SPMS develops following an initial relapsing course, with gradual disability progression occurring with or without relapses. Without treatment, around half of RRMS patients transition to SPMS within 10–20 years.
- Primary Progressive MS (PPMS): PPMS is characterised by a steady and gradual worsening of disability from disease onset and represents 10–15% of MS cases.
ICD-10 subtype codes and a new era of real-world data precision
Historically, claims data lacked the granularity to differentiate MS disease forms, as all patients were coded under a single ICD‑10 code (G35). From 1 October 2025, new ICD‑10 codes enable clear identification of RRMS, PPMS, and SPMS subtypes, including active and non‑active disease states.
Although adoption will take time, these codes mark a pivotal step forward for real‑world evidence generation, allowing more accurate assessment of treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety signals across distinct MS forms.
The evolution of MS treatments: From relapse-focused to progression-directed strategies
Early Therapeutic Landscape: Relapse Suppression as the Initial Priority
Given the predominance of RRMS at diagnosis, early MS drug development focused on reducing relapse rates and MRI activity of new or enlarging lesions, reflecting CNS inflammation. This led to the development of multiple disease‑modifying treatments, including:
- Platform injectable therapies (e.g. interferons, glatiramer acetate)
- Oral therapies (e.g. fumarates, S1P receptor modulators)
- Biologics (e.g. anti‑CD20 monoclonal antibodies)
Despite these advances, treatment options for progressive MS remained limited, as disability progression often occurs independently of relapse activity.
Breakthrough approvals in progressive multiple sclerosis
Ocrelizumab (Ocrevus®) became the first therapy approved for PPMS in 2017, representing a major milestone for this underserved population. A subcutaneous formulation, approved in 2024, has further improved treatment flexibility.
Some RRMS therapies have since expanded into active SPMS; however, treatment options for progressive disease remain constrained, particularly for non‑active progression, reinforcing the need for novel therapeutic mechanisms.
Emergence of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (BTKi)
Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (BTKi) represent a promising shift toward therapies capable of targeting compartmentalised CNS inflammation, including microglial activation, which is a suspected driver of progression beyond relapses. As oral agents, BTKis may also improve patient adherence, reduce infusion burden, and expand treatment accessibility. There is currently a race for which BTKi will be the first approved for MS.
- Fenebrutinib is a CNS-penetrant BTKi being studied for the treatment of PPMS and RRMS. Results of a phase III trial were released in February 2026, where fenebrutinib demonstrated non-inferiority to ocrelizumab and reduced disability progression risk by 12%, with differences showing up at 24 weeks.
- Orelabrutinib is another BTKi being developed for PPMS and SPMS. Early results showed strong phase II efficacy in RRMS, demonstrating significant reductions in new brain lesions. Orelabrutinib is now progressing into global phase III trials for PPMS and SPMS.
- Tolebrutinib initially showed wide applicability across RRMS, SPMS, and PPMS; however, regulatory setbacks have been faced due to liver safety concerns and the lack of an established favourable benefit-risk profile. Tolebrutinib as Cenrifki® was provisionally approved in July 2025 in the United Arab Emirates for the treatment of SPMS.
Real World Data (RWD) insights: Treatment initiation trends
Analysis of open claims data from 2021 to 2025 reveals a clear shift in first‑line treatment patterns among newly diagnosed MS patients.
Biologics have become increasingly dominant, driven largely by anti‑CD20 antibodies. By 2025, nearly two‑thirds of newly diagnosed patients initiated treatment with a biologic, while use of oral therapies and platform injectables steadily declined.
Notably, anti‑CD20 therapies accounted for 49% of all first‑line treatments across modalities.
Looking ahead: Progression, precision and real-world evidence
The MS treatment landscape has evolved from a primary focus on inflammatory relapse suppression towards addressing disability progression in SPMS and PPMS. Anti‑CD20 biologics remain foundational, while emerging oral therapies have the potential to reshape clinical practice, patient preferences, and payer dynamics.
The introduction of MS‑specific ICD‑10 subtype codes in October 2025 represents a transformative moment for real‑world evidence, enabling more precise, form-specific insights. Together, therapeutic innovation and improved data granularity position the field for a new era of understanding, with the ultimate goal of improving long‑term outcomes for people living with MS.
With new MS subtype codes and an evolving treatment paradigm, the demand for precise, real‑world insight has never been greater. Symphony Health, an ICON plc company, provides industry‑leading data, analytics, and expertise to help life sciences teams understand treatment patterns, patient journeys, and outcomes at scale. Discover how real‑world evidence can power the next generation of MS innovation.
To learn more about how Symphony Health can support your RWD strategy, connect with us today.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Making sense of the rapidly changing biosimilars landscape
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel