Lessons learned in EU HTA Regulation’s first year
The EU Health Technology Assessment Regulation (HTAR) became operational on 12 January 2025, marking the official transition from planning to implementation for Joint Clinical Assessments (JCAs) and Joint Scientific Consultations (JSCs). The first year focused on oncology medicines and advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), establishing the foundations of the new system and laying the groundwork for expansion in 2026.
The objective is to streamline and harmonise the review procedures, enabling patients to access new medications sooner. The process applies across the EU as well as to Norway, Switzerland, Ukraine and the UK. In January 2028 it will come into force for rare disease and two years later all medicinal products will follow the JCA process. This article looks at lessons learned in year one and what changes to expect in 2026.
Key learnings from 2025
- Scale of activity: The first year supported 10 JCAs and seven JSCs. This is relatively small given the number of oncology and advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) under investigation worldwide. The number will scale significantly in 2026.
- Process timing: The 90-day window between the release of the Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) framework and the dossier submission is extremely tight. Advance preparation well before the formal EMA submission is recommended.
- Evidence gaps: Initial assessments highlighted common uncertainties such as risk of bias in single-blinded trials, concerns over non-European trial locations, and inadequate handling of missing data. Patient characteristics, treatment pathways and standards of care can differ outside Europe. These variabilities can increase the uncertainty about the relevance and robustness of clinical evidence for EU decision making.
- Institutional shift: Responsibility for HTA submissions has shifted from local country teams to global market access or health economics outcome reporting (HEOR) teams, requiring new internal playbooks for cross-functional collaboration. Among other things, playbooks should include clarification of roles and responsibilities and outline best practices and procedures. The goal is to ensure that there are agreed ways of working across the wider team.
What’s new in 2026
The 2026 Work Program anticipates a significant scale-up to approximately 50 JCAs for medicinal products. The launch of the first JCAs for high-risk medical devices will begin in June 2026. Key updates include:
- IT infrastructure: The HTA IT Platform is now fully operational for developers to submit requests and dossiers.
- JSC frequency: The EMA has four specific request periods for JSCs (January, April, June, and September) to provide more predictable engagement slots. The HTA Coordination Group (HTACG) anticipates eight to 12 JSCs for medicines and two to five for medical devices, reinforcing the importance of early evidence‑generation planning.
- Early expert involvement: New refinements aim to involve individual clinical experts and patients earlier in the process to improve the transparency and quality of the JCA.
- Medical devices formally enter scope: The HTACG’s Emerging Health Technologies report identifies 15 medical device categories potentially eligible for JCAs in 2026. These include implantable prosthetics, active‑implantable devices, and cardiocirculatory devices. This is the first year high‑risk medical devices meaningfully enter the EU‑level assessment process.
PICO data complexity
One of the more complex requirements of the JCA submissions process is the PICO framework. Health technology developers should carefully choose and appropriately define outcomes during the scoping process. This is crucial to for outcomes assessment and to expedite the submissions process.
- Live implementation: Since the JCA became mandatory for oncology and ATMP products, the first real-world JCAs have confirmed that PICO complexity is a practical, ongoing issue. Two of the JCA submissions entered preparation by March 2025.
- Ongoing validation: Throughout 2025 industry bodies such as European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) and various consulting groups have reflected on these live cases, noting that the "PICO anxiety" predicted during simulations remains a reality in the operational phase due to diverse Member State standards of care.
Current JCA pipeline
The European Commission’s updated list of ongoing JCAs released on 20 January 2026, reflects the expanding pipeline of medicines under review. It includes 11 products: seven chemicals, two ATMPs, and two biologics.
Conclusion
The first year of the EU HTA Regulation demonstrated both its ambition and complexity. With JCAs set to expand significantly in 2026 and high‑risk medical devices entering the process, sponsor success will depend on:
- Early, proactive evidence planning
- Stronger internal coordination across global and regional teams
- Familiarity with the evolving JCA and JSC processes
The lessons from 2025 provide a clearer roadmap for navigating Europe’s HTA landscape. Effective collaboration and coordination between knowledgeable teams when submitting JCAs can avoid some of the missteps of the first year of the regulations. The right strategies can overcome these early challenges, leading to benefits for sponsors and, most importantly, for patients.
Contact us to learn how ICON guides sponsors through JCA requirements.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Making sense of the rapidly changing biosimilars landscape
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel