Maximising data capture in obesity trials: ICON’s imaging strategy against “silent attrition”
Global obesity trials are scaling fast with GLP‑1 therapies, making complete data capture essential to preserve scientific integrity and timelines. ICON implemented a pragmatic DXA strategy—modified hand positioning and a dual‑scan workflow with centralized review—that preserved full visceral fat datasets, preventing “silent attrition” from incomplete imaging.
Key takeaways
- Up to 10–15% of participants can fall outside the standard DXA field‑of‑view, jeopardizing visceral fat calculations.
- Two simple, scalable techniques (thumb‑up hand positioning and dual‑scan + centralized merge) enabled complete datasets across a 100‑site global network.
- Full data capture strengthens integrity, timelines, and budgets in competitive GLP‑1 obesity trials.
Context — GLP 1 scale raises the stakes for complete datasets
Obesity trials are scaling rapidly. With the rise of GLP-1 therapies like semaglutide and tirzepatide, sponsors are launching global studies with thousands of participants across hundreds of sites, all competing for overlapping target populations. Eli Lilly’s SURMOUNT-1 study, for example, enrolled over 2,500 patients to demonstrate the efficacy of tirzepatide, while Novo Nordisk’s semaglutide trial, STEP 1, enrolled nearly 2,000 patients and both companies included a whole-body DXA imaging sub study to assess body composition.
This surge in clinical trial activity within obesity, especially around GLP-1 therapies, has created intense competition for eligible participants. Sponsors are under more pressure to recruit faster, retain better and maximise data capture from every individual enrolled to deliver robust, quality data and reach market ahead of the competition. When approximately 10-15% of carefully recruited and engaged participants are at risk of being lost due to logistical imaging challenges, imaging becomes more than a protocol requirement—it can be leveraged as a parallel retention strategy to ensure 100% data capture.
The imaging gap: A hidden risk to retention
DXA scans are widely used in obesity trials for their speed, comfort and ability to differentiate between fat, bone and lean mass. They are particularly valuable for identifying visceral fat, a key indicator of cardiometabolic risk. However, unlike MRI, DXA machines are not designed to accommodate larger body sizes. If any of the torso falls outside of the field-of-view, the software will not provide visceral fat measurements. For up to 15% of participants, the torso data may not be fully captured using standard DXA protocols, representing a significant loss of participant data.
The standard protocol is to image participants on an offset, which for most individuals would capture the full torso and full limbs on the offset side. The data for the torso would be captured and the data for the limbs would then be mirrored to provide an approximate dataset for both sides of the body. For the 10-15% of individuals whose torso would be too large to fit within the imaging field, this means the DXA machine would be unable to make the appropriate visceral fat calculations.
This limitation posed a risk not only to data integrity but to functional participant retention. Individuals who undergo screening and imaging but yield incomplete data may be excluded from analysis, effectively lost to the study despite being enrolled.
ICON’s small but mighty imaging solution for 100% data capture
ICON recognised the increasing risk of participant data collection tied to the logistics and limitations of the DXA machines themselves. To avoid any data loss, ICON implemented a scalable imaging strategy that enabled full data capture by making small adjustments to scan techniques.
Two tailored techniques were introduced:
- Modified hand positioning: Adjusting the hand to a thumb-up position created additional space within the imaging field, improving torso coverage.
- Dual-scan method: Sites acquired two scans, when necessary, one offset for limb data and one centred for full abdominal imaging. These were combined via centralised automation to produce a complete dataset.
To ensure consistency across the global network of 100 sites for this particular trial, ICON’s Medical Imaging and Cardiac Safety (IMC) team provided detailed imaging manuals and training modules. Imaging data was centralised and reviewed by specialists who analysed, validated and merged the scans, preserving both accuracy and operational efficiency.
Risk addressed
Up to 10–15% at risk of incomplete torso capture without adaptation.
Solution
Thumb‑up positioning + dual‑scan workflow with centralized merge.
Result
Complete visceral fat analysis at scale.
Future-proofing obesity imaging
As obesity trials evolve to assess not just weight loss but the quality of that loss by distinguishing fat from muscle and subcutaneous from visceral fat, imaging precision becomes even more critical in understanding the long-term impacts of these therapies. While MRI has more robust fat and muscle discernment capabilities—quantifying subcutaneous, intramuscular and visceral fats with the ability to exclude organs and major blood vessels from muscle tissue, DXA provides quick and efficient scans that quantify the torso, limbs and head and can separate visceral fat from subcutaneous fat within the abdomen. Identifying visceral fat is important as it has a strong, positive association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). These distinctions and the innovations they support are only possible with high-quality imaging.
DXA remains the most feasible modality for large-scale trials, offering speed and cost efficiency while fulfilling key measurement needs. MRI, while more precise, is often reserved for smaller subgroups or early-phase studies due to its higher cost and complexity.
ICON’s approach ensures that DXA can be implemented effectively even in diverse populations, avoiding the silent attrition of participants whose scans would otherwise be incomplete. This strategy complements the multi-level, multi-channel recruitment and engagement approaches used in obesity trials to combat high dropout rates, supporting trial timelines and data integrity.
Outcome: Complete data, full value
By enabling complete visceral fat analysis for every participant with a scalable DXA scan technique, ICON is helping sponsors avoid data loss from an estimated 10–15% of their cohorts. This not only preserves the scientific integrity of their trials but also protects their operational timelines and budgets.
In today’s competitive obesity trial landscape, where recruitment is hard-won and retention is paramount, proactive imaging design is a strategic advantage.
Connect with us to learn how ICON’s Medical Imaging team can maximise your data capture to ensure the high data integrity and retention for meaningful outcomes.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
- Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Accelerating access
-
Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Accelerating access
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
Bridging science and clinical operability for neurologic monoclonal antibodies
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
More than monitoring
-
Optimising biotech funding
-
Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
- Partnership insights
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Building a comparative evidence base using network meta-analysis
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel