The FDA has issued a new draft guidance on additive manufacturing (AM) for medical devices. The guidance lays out a clear framework for manufacturers to accelerate innovation and reviews many of the technical issues, Quality System requirements, and testing considerations that should be addressed in an AM programme.
Background on Additive Manufacturing
AM is a fast-growing manufacturing technique inclusive of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Device manufacturers can rapidly prototype and create custom, complex devices as a single piece through AM, which builds objects by iteratively stacking two-dimensional layers of material. Many believe that, in the future, AM will become progressively more integral to the manufacturing of medical devices and implants.
AM technology has many healthcare applications. For instance, AM technology can help surgeons prepare for and perform surgeries. With little training, a surgeon can use an individual patient’s data from 3D imaging sources, such as computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging, to construct anatomically-matched devices, prosthetics, and surgical guides. These products can make surgery quicker, safer, and custom to a patient’s unique characteristics.
AM technology can also be used to synthesise pharmaceuticals. In fact, on March 22, 2016, the FDA approved the first 3D printed drug: Aprecia's epilepsy drug SPRITAM. SPRITAM is easier for patients to swallow because the pill rapidly disintegrates in a patient’s mouth. This feature is the result of employing a 3D printing technique that creates tablets without using compression. This technique can potentially help physicians medicate the 40 to 50 per cent of adults in the US who report difficulty swallowing pills.
The FDA has cleared more than 85 applications for 3D printed medical devices, including printed cells, organs, tissues, and skin; implants for the knee, hip, acetabulum, and spine; cutting guides for ear cartilage, mandibular space maintainers, dental mesh, cranial plates; and plates for tumour cases. However, the FDA has yet to approve a high-risk device that requires premarket approval.
To better understand the AM challenges in the medical device space, the FDA held a public workshop in October 2014 entitled “Additive Manufacturing of Medical Devices: An Interactive Discussion on the Technical Considerations of 3D Printing.” Based on the feedback they received, the FDA developed a new draft guidance for medical device manufacturers entitled “Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Devices.”
About the Guidance
The FDA issued a new draft guidance document on May 10, 2016 for public comment. It outlines the overall AM process, which consists of the following steps: (1) design, (2) software workflow, (3) creation of a build file while concurrently establishing material controls, (4) post-processing, and (5) final finished device testing and characterisation.
The draft guidance includes associated technical considerations and recommendations that manufacturers should consider throughout this whole process, including the development, production, process validation, and final finished testing phases of devices.
There are many variables that affect how the AM process is conducted, such as whether or not the device in question is an implant or is load bearing, and whether it is available in standard sizes or is custom-fitted to the patient. Generally, the FDA will subject AM devices to the same classification and regulatory requirements to which they currently subject non-AM devices of the same type.
The draft guidance follows the overall AM process and is organised into two topic areas: (1) Design and Manufacturing Considerations (Section V) and (2) Device Testing Considerations (Section VI).
The Design and Manufacturing Considerations (Section V) addresses fulfilment of Quality System requirements for AM and includes the following:
- Device Design
- Software Workflow
- Materials Control
- Post-Processing
- Process Validation and Acceptance Activities
- Quality Data
The Device Testing Considerations (Section VI) addresses pre-market notification submissions information and includes the following:
- Device Description
- Mechanical Testing
- Dimensional Measurements
- Material Characterisation
- Cleaning and Sterilisation
- Biocompatibility
- Additional Labelling Considerations
If you need any assistance with implementing this new guidance from the FDA once it has been accepted, please contact ICON.
Melvin G. Fletcher III
ISO 13485, CMDR, and MDD/CE Marking Certified Lead Auditor
ICON Regulatory Services
JoAnne Bronikowski, BS, RAC
Sr. Manager, Regulatory Affairs
ICON Medical Device Regulatory Services
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel