Addendum Issued on Estimands and Sensitivity Analyses
In August 2017, the EMA issued an addendum to ICH E9 (Statistical Principles for clinical trials) on estimands and sensitivity analyses to address the issue.
Confirmatory clinical trials are conducted to quantify the effects of a treatment and to provide evidence of efficacy and safety to support regulatory decision making, however many clinical trial protocols are written in such a way that the trial objectives lack clarity and/or details. Vague objective statements can result in a statistical analysis that addresses a different scientific question to the one intended. Furthermore, the assumptions particularly around missing data are often not clearly stated and often clinically unrealistic. Subsequently clinical trials can report results that are not helpful to clinicians, patients or regulators.
Structured framework and tools for estimation and testing
The addendum presents a structured framework to link trial objectives to a suitable trial design and the tools for estimation and hypothesis testing. The framework primarily focuses on the concept of estimands which translates trial objectives into a precise definition of the treatment effect that is to be estimated. Sensitivity analyses for an estimand are also covered.
As outlined in the addendum, an estimand defines the target of estimation for a particular trial objective (i.e. “what is to be estimated”) through specification of
- Population
- Variable
- Handling of intercurrent events
- Population-level summary for the variable
Once defined a suitable method of estimation (i.e. the analytic approach, referred to as the main estimator) can then be selected. The main estimator is typically underpinned by certain assumptions which need to be stated. To explore the robustness of inferences from the main estimator to deviations from its underlying assumptions, sensitivity analyses are conducted, targeting the same estimand (see figure below).
Figure 1: Aligning target of estimation, method of estimation, and sensitivity analysis, for a given trial objective.
How will this impact the way trials are designed?
Randomised trials are free from baseline confounding but certain events that occur after randomisation complicate the description and estimation of treatment effects. These events are termed “intercurrent events” in the addendum and include among others, use of rescue medication, discontinuation of treatment, treatment switching and death
The assumptions made regarding intercurrent events are a key component when defining an estimand. However, the four attributes as discussed above (ie population, variable, intercurrent events, population summary for the variable) are not independent and subsequently should be consciously and explicitly considered in relationship to each other.
The ICH E9 addendum outlines five strategies for addressing intercurrent events, 1) treatment policy, 2) composite, 3) hypothetical, 4) principal stratum and 5) while on treatment strategy. The addendum expects a protocol to identify and document key intercurrent events for a trial and apply, with scientific reason, the proposed strategies. More than one strategy can be applied per study to accommodate different assumptions for different intercurrent events.
If you would like to know more about the potential systematic effect of intercurrent events on the estimate of treatment effect and how the ICH E9 addendum may impact your business, please submit an enquiry form.
Reference
Draft ICH E9 (R1) addendum on Estimands and sensitivity analysis in clinical trials to the guideline on statistical principles for clinical trials, step 2b - Revision 1
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel