Stability studies play a crucial role in determining how a drug product's quality changes over time when exposed to various environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and light. A drug product may degrade over time to a point where it is no longer effective or may become unsafe due to the formation of impurities with potentially unknown toxicity. Ensuring the safety and efficacy of the drug product throughout its lifecycle is essential to generate reliable clinical data, which is ultimately required for drug registration.
Design of a stability program and choice of product on stability
The requirement for stability data increases throughout the product development, as outlined in the International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guideline Stability Testing on New Drug Substances and Products, Q1A(R2).
Early stability studies can be performed on technical batches of drug substance and drug product that are manufactured using a process similar to that of the future clinical material. Non-GMP drug product is typically available earlier than GMP material, allowing stability studies to be initiated before the GMP batch is manufactured.
These non-GMP or early GMP batches provide valuable insights into potential formulation challenges and help identify early signs of stability issues. Additionally, the choice of a container-closure system is crucial to the success of stability testing, as the primary packaging must protect the product and be compatible with it.
Stability studies are conducted at the intended storage conditions (long-term) or at elevated storage conditions (accelerated). The storage conditions to be considered are given in the table below. Accelerated storage conditions will increase the speed of degradation and provide a projection of what may happen after long-term storage. Frozen storage conditions do not have officially matched accelerated conditions, but various storage conditions can support determination of impact of any temperature excursions.
Long term | Intermediate | Accelerated |
25°C ± 2°C/60% RH ± 5% RH 30°C ± 2°C/65% RH ± 5% RH | 30°C ± 2°C/65% RH ± 5% RH | 40°C ± 2°C/75% RH ± 5% RH |
5°C ± 3°C | NA | 25°C ± 2°C/60% RH ± 5% RH |
- 20°C ± 5°C | NA | NA |
Based on the shelf-life requirements, a stability plan has to be drafted and if needed included as part of the IMPD/IND.
A stability plan should describe the following:
- Timepoints to be tested
- Tests performed per timepoint (chemical, physical and microbiological testing). Sterility testing should be performed at minimum at initial and at the end of the proposed shelf-life. Stability- indicating parameters should be tested at each timepoint.
- Storage conditions (long-term, intermediate, accelerated)
- In-use stability (if applicable)
- Compatibility with materials used for dosing the drug product (if applicable)
- Shelf-life extrapolation plan (optional)
Shelf-life determination
Stability studies determine the shelf-life at the intended storage conditions when the product is packaged in the defined container closure system. Stability studies are performed at long-term conditions at the intended storage conditions of the drug product and determine the shelf-life. Accelerated storage conditions can be used to determine the impact of temperature deviations during transit and storage or as basis for shelf-life extrapolation. Extrapolation of the shelf-life based on stability results may be possible when using accelerated storage conditions.
Performing a stability study on non-GMP material ensures that when the GMP batches are made, an initial shelf-life can be assigned to the drug product. Later in the clinical drug development, GMP/clinical batches must be put on stability and these stability data will be included in the registration of new medicine at the regulatory authorities.
What Is evaluated in a stability study?
A comprehensive stability program evaluates multiple aspects of the drug product to ensure its quality and efficacy. Physical assessments monitor appearance, color, phase separation, and particulate formation, which can indicate degradation. Chemical assessments focus on factors such as potency, degradation products, pH levels, and preservative content, ensuring that the drug maintains its intended effectiveness and safety profile. Microbial assessments are critical for verifying sterility or microbial limits, especially in products that are sterile or don’t contain preservatives.
Stability indicating parameters have to be assessed each timepoint to ensure analysis of trends in stability. Parameters that are not expected to be essential for determining stability may be analyzed only at specific timepoints.
Clinical development relevance
The required shelf-life and storage conditions depend on the clinical study that the IMP is used for. The shelf-life for early phase clinical drug products should at least cover the time required between manufacturing, analysis and dosing. Early phase drug products may require a limited amount of stability timepoints for the initial clinical trials, but when the drug products are distributed to multiple sites and countries more extensive stability studies are required.
Containers or dosing devices that are used for clinical dosing are also subject to compatibility/stability testing to ensure stability of the drug product up to administration. Stability of the drug product after the final formulation step (e.g. dilution, mixing, reconstitution) is warranted for a limited amount of time (hours/days) depending on the clinical need.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a stability program is essential for ensuring that drug products are safe, effective, and reliable throughout their shelf-life. Stability testing during early development provides critical data on the stability of both the drug substance and drug product. Shelf-life assignment should be based on this stability data and may not be supported by extrapolation from accelerated conditions.
Companies such as ICON’s Analytical and Pharmaceutical Solutions (APS) division are well-positioned to critical activities, offering state-of-the-art analytical capabilities and regulatory expertise to guide stability testing throughout all phases of drug development from protocol design to data interpretation and regulatory submission support.
References
- ICH Q1E: Evaluation of Stability Data
- ICH Q1A(R2) Stability Testing on New Drug Substances and Products
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Guidelines for Stability Testing
- European Medicines Agency (EMA) Stability Requirements
Authors:
Corey Ohnmacht, PhD
Suzanne Jansen, MSc
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- mHealth wearables
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Behind Biotech: Stories of science and resilience
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel