As pharmaceuticals move from animal to first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials, establishing appropriate strategies to minimise risk in early phase clinical trials is necessary and should be a priority for the safety and wellness of clinical trial participants, whether patients or healthy volunteers. The goal of FIH clinical trials is to study the human pharmacology, tolerability and safety of pharmaceuticals to compare how effects seen in non-clinical studies translate into humans. To further improve strategies to identify and mitigate risks for trial participants, the European Medicines Agency implemented an updated guidance in February 2018. The Guidance on Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Risks for First in Human and Early Clinical Trials with Investigational Medicinal Products addresses the important issues needing consideration during the study design process.
Traditionally, FIH clinical trials were mostly associated with a single ascending dose (SAD) design, and then followed by a multiple ascending dose (MAD) clinical trial. Yet, with the emerging integration of pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and human safety data during trials, there has been an increase in performing early phase clinical trials with integrated protocols that combine different study parts.
Adopting a strategic early phase study design can help mitigate risks, and accelerate drug approval and time to market.
Key Aspects in Study Planning
An early phase clinical trial study design will optimise knowledge gained from the study, while ensuring the safety of participants. By collecting more data and information about a drug’s potential risks in early phase studies – rather than racing through regulatory hurdles – sponsors could increase R&D success later.
Here are some key considerations:
- Choice of study population. There are many factors to consider when deciding whether to use healthy volunteers or patients. The risks of enroling healthy volunteers versus patients must be weighed including toxicities, PK variability, lifestyle conditions, benefits to patients and special populations. Studies with healthy volunteers must have inclusion/exclusion criteria that require vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory assessments to be normal. Furthermore, protocols should describe the exact nature of assessments, including timing and anticipated changes to assessments. Protocols must also define the length of subject follow-up and detail how subjects with abnormal findings will be followed after the end of the study period. Monitoring for safety effects must take into consideration PD effects, not just PK profile data.
- Careful dose selection. Protocols needs to outline and explain the estimated initial drug dose, maximum dose exposure and subsequent dose escalation steps. Also, all available non-clinical information, such as toxicology profiles, should be taken into consideration for starting doses, dose escalation and maximum exposure in early phase clinical trials. Moreover, clinical data, such as PK, PD and adverse event reports, occurring during the trial will need to be considered. Additionally, protocols should describe the decision-making criteria for adapting dosage based on clinical data collected during the trial. Lastly, for FIH trials, sentinel dosing of two subjects (one active, one placebo) is required, at minimum, for the first SAD and MAD cohorts.
- Detail integrated protocols. Due to the complexity of integrated protocols – in which multiple objectives are investigated within the same clinical trial – their review can be more complicated and time-consuming. The criteria to move from one part of a study, such as SAD to MAD, must be defined. While it is acceptable to overlap SAD and MAD portions of a trial, it is necessary for the expected exposure to already have been evaluated in a SAD cohort prior to being evaluated in a MAD cohort. Moreover, food effect studies can be conducted in parallel with the SAD, provided the dose level in the food effect trial has been evaluated in a prior SAD cohort. Drug-drug interaction studies should not be integrated into FIH and dose escalation protocols unless there is a need that requires a specific concomitant medication in the initial patient studies.
- Define stopping rules. FIH and dose escalation protocols must define stopping rules for individuals, cohorts, dose escalation and the entire study. Rules must specify whether the rule is a temporary stop for further evaluation, or a final end to dosing for the study. Furthermore, studies with healthy volunteers must include precaution in the event of the following:
- A serious adverse reaction in one subject
- Severe non-serious adverse reactions in two subjects in the same cohort, independent of within or not within the same system-organ-class
- Choice of trial sites. Pick appropriate clinical facilities conducted by investigators and staff with the necessary training and experience in early phase clinical trials. It is a necessity for FIH clinical trials to take place under controlled conditions with close supervision of trial participants during and after dosing. Sites must have access to emergency supplies, and staff must be prepared for medical emergencies. While FIH studies should be conducted at a single site, if multiple sites are required for enrolment, protocols should include a description of measures to reduce risks that might occur from the use of multiple sites.
A well-designed, robust early phase study strategy can help you minimise risk for trial participants and avoid further drug development challenges that frequently cause added study costs and delayed timelines. By partnering with a CRO, early phase experts can assist in designing an effective and comprehensive early phase study strategy to help accelerate product approval and market entry by identifying and addressing safety and regulatory issues early on.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Flexible delivery models
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel