Skip to main content
Home
  • Solutions
    Clinical solutions
    Blended Solutions Cardiac Safety Solutions Clinical & Scientific Operations Decentralised Clinical Trials Early Clinical Laboratories Medical Imaging Site & Patient Solutions Strategic Solutions
    Consulting & Commercial
    Asset Development Consulting Commercial Positioning Language Services Outcome Measures Real World Intelligence Regulatory Affairs Symphony Health data
    meeting
    Case studies

    Reducing time to market, delivering on quality, providing deep therapeutic expertise and enhancing R&D ROI.

    Innovative research tools showcase
    Technologies

    Technology solutions from early phase through to post-marketing.

  • Sectors
    Sectors

    ICON provides its full range of clinical, consulting and commercial services across several industry sectors.

    Read more
    Biotech Government and Public Health Medical Device Pharmaceuticals
    Biotechnology services navigation panel
    Biotech

    Developing transformative therapies requires a flexible approach.

    Employee engagement program overview
    ICON and You

    Partners making a difference.

  • Therapeutics
    Therapeutics
    Cardiovascular Central Nervous System Endocrine & Metabolic Disorders Hepatology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine & Immunology Oncology
    Cross-therapeutics
    Biosimilars Cell and Gene Therapies Medical Device Pediatrics Rare & Orphan Diseases Vaccines Women's Health
    Obesity 2025 insights image
    Obesity

    A focus on combination therapies requires appropriate obesity-specific trial designs, long-term follow-up studies and diverse patient recruitment.

    Biological research visual element
    Therapeutics insights

    ICON's therapeutic experts contribute regularly to industry publications and the creation of thought leadership content. Read more.

  • Insights
    Insights
    Digital Disruption Patient Centricity Regulatory Intelligence Therapeutics insights Transforming Trials Value Based Healthcare Blog Videos Webinar Channel
    banners
    From bottlenecks to breakthroughs

    Human-centred strategies for faster study starts

    More than monitoring whitepaper
    More than monitoring

    How modern monitoring paradigms impact CRA roles

    digital globe network with icons
    Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments

    A planning guide for health technology developers

  • News & Events
    News & Events

    ICON regularly contributes thought leadership to industry media publications and conferences, and has been recognised as one of the world’s leading Contract Research Organisations through a number of high-profile industry awards.

    Read more
    Press releases In the News Mediakit Awards Events Webinars Social media
    webinar
    Best practices in global flow cytometry quality control and harmonisation

    5 March 2026. Register today.

    webinar
    When patients lead: Breaking barriers in ultra-rare disease drug development

    3 March 2026. Register today.

  • About ICON
    About ICON
    Company history ICON at a glance ICON in Asia Pacific ICON in Latin America Leadership Quality
    ICON for
    Patients Volunteers Investigators Jobs & Careers Investors Suppliers
    Responsible business practice indicators
    Sustainability, charity, inclusion and belonging

    ICON Cares is our commitment to making a positive impact on our people, environment and our community.

    Modern reception area at Dublin office
    ICON at a glance

    Delivering successful outcomes across the clinical development lifecycle.

  • Careers
  • Investors
  • Contact
  • 日本語
  • 简体中文
  1. Home
  2. Insights
  3. Blog
  4. Five key considerations for writing first-in-human protocols under EMA guidelines

Five key considerations for writing first-in-human protocols under EMA guidelines

Page tools
Share Share
Facebook

Share on Facebook

Facebook

Share on X

Facebook

Share on Linkedin

Bluesky

Share on Bluesky

As pharmaceuticals move from animal to first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials, establishing appropriate strategies to minimise risk in early phase clinical trials is necessary and should be a priority for the safety and wellness of clinical trial participants, whether patients or healthy volunteers. The goal of FIH clinical trials is to study the human pharmacology, tolerability and safety of pharmaceuticals to compare how effects seen in non-clinical studies translate into humans. To further improve strategies to identify and mitigate risks for trial participants, the European Medicines Agency implemented an updated guidance in February 2018. The Guidance on Strategies to Identify and Mitigate Risks for First in Human and Early Clinical Trials with Investigational Medicinal Products addresses the important issues needing consideration during the study design process.
 
Traditionally, FIH clinical trials were mostly associated with a single ascending dose (SAD) design, and then followed by a multiple ascending dose (MAD) clinical trial. Yet, with the emerging integration of pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and human safety data during trials, there has been an increase in performing early phase clinical trials with integrated protocols that combine different study parts.  
 
Adopting a strategic early phase study design can help mitigate risks, and accelerate drug approval and time to market.

Key Aspects in Study Planning

An early phase clinical trial study design will optimise knowledge gained from the study, while ensuring the safety of participants. By collecting more data and information about a drug’s potential risks in early phase studies – rather than racing through regulatory hurdles – sponsors could increase R&D success later.

Here are some key considerations:

  • Choice of study population. There are many factors to consider when deciding whether to use healthy volunteers or patients. The risks of enroling healthy volunteers versus patients must be weighed including toxicities, PK variability, lifestyle conditions, benefits to patients and special populations. Studies with healthy volunteers must have inclusion/exclusion criteria that require vital signs, ECGs, and clinical laboratory assessments to be normal. Furthermore, protocols should describe the exact nature of assessments, including timing and anticipated changes to assessments. Protocols must also define the length of subject follow-up and detail how subjects with abnormal findings will be followed after the end of the study period. Monitoring for safety effects must take into consideration PD effects, not just PK profile data.
  • Careful dose selection. Protocols needs to outline and explain the estimated initial drug dose, maximum dose exposure and subsequent dose escalation steps. Also, all available non-clinical information, such as toxicology profiles, should be taken into consideration for starting doses, dose escalation and maximum exposure in early phase clinical trials. Moreover, clinical data, such as PK, PD and adverse event reports, occurring during the trial will need to be considered. Additionally, protocols should describe the decision-making criteria for adapting dosage based on clinical data collected during the trial. Lastly, for FIH trials, sentinel dosing of two subjects (one active, one placebo) is required, at minimum, for the first SAD and MAD cohorts.
  • Detail integrated protocols. Due to the complexity of integrated protocols – in which multiple objectives are investigated within the same clinical trial – their review can be more complicated and time-consuming. The criteria to move from one part of a study, such as SAD to MAD, must be defined. While it is acceptable to overlap SAD and MAD portions of a trial, it is necessary for the expected exposure to already have been evaluated in a SAD cohort prior to being evaluated in a MAD cohort. Moreover, food effect studies can be conducted in parallel with the SAD, provided the dose level in the food effect trial has been evaluated in a prior SAD cohort. Drug-drug interaction studies should not be integrated into FIH and dose escalation protocols unless there is a need that requires a specific concomitant medication in the initial patient studies.
  • Define stopping rules. FIH and dose escalation protocols must define stopping rules for individuals, cohorts, dose escalation and the entire study. Rules must specify whether the rule is a temporary stop for further evaluation, or a final end to dosing for the study. Furthermore, studies with healthy volunteers must include precaution in the event of the following:
    • A serious adverse reaction in one subject
    • Severe non-serious adverse reactions in two subjects in the same cohort, independent of within or not within the same system-organ-class
  • Choice of trial sites. Pick appropriate clinical facilities conducted by investigators and staff with the necessary training and experience in early phase clinical trials. It is a necessity for FIH clinical trials to take place under controlled conditions with close supervision of trial participants during and after dosing. Sites must have access to emergency supplies, and staff must be prepared for medical emergencies. While FIH studies should be conducted at a single site, if multiple sites are required for enrolment, protocols should include a description of measures to reduce risks that might occur from the use of multiple sites.

A well-designed, robust early phase study strategy can help you minimise risk for trial participants and avoid further drug development challenges that frequently cause added study costs and delayed timelines. By partnering with a CRO, early phase experts can assist in designing an effective and comprehensive early phase study strategy to help accelerate product approval and market entry by identifying and addressing safety and regulatory issues early on.

In this section
In this section
  • Digital Disruption
    • Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
    • Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
    • AI and clinical trials
      • Impact of AI on Outcomes Based Contracting
      • Using AI for site ID and selection
      • Applying AI to manage the risks and costs of postmarketing requirements
      • Integrating AI into Clinical Research: How AI is Enhancing Clinical Development
    • Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
    • Clinical Trial Tokenisation
    • Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
    • mHealth wearables
      • Cybersecurity
      • Digital Endpoints
    • Personalising Digital Health
    • Real World Data
      • Harnessing technology to maximise Real World Evidence value
      • Meeting Evidentiary Needs with EHRs
      • Post-Market Surveillance for Medical Devices
    • The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
    • Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
    • Software as a medical device (SaMD)
      • Developing AI in SaMD
  • Patient Centricity
    • Accelerating clinical development through DHTs
    • Agile Clinical Monitoring
    • Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
    • Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
    • Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
      • Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials whitepaper
    • Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
    • Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
      • A guide to safety data migrations
      • Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
      • Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
      • The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
      • Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
      • Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
    • Patient voice survey
    • Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
    • Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
    • Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
    • Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
  • Regulatory Intelligence
    • Accelerating access
    • Meeting requirements for Joint Clinical Assessments
    • Navigating the regulatory landscape in the US and Japan:
    • Preparing for ICH GCP E6(R3) implementation
    • An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
    • EU Clinical Trials Regulation
      • EMA guideline on computerised systems and electronic data in clinical trials
      • EU CTR Whitepaper
    • Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
    • Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
    • Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
    • Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
    • Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
    • Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
    • RACE for Children Act
    • Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
    • Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
    • Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
    • Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
    • Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
    • Transfer of marketing authorisation
    • Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
    • Streamlining dossier preparation
  • Therapeutics insights
    • Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
    • Cardiovascular
      • Mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular trials
    • Cell and Gene Therapies
      • Approaching the CAR T-cell therapy horizon
      • Cell and Gene ebook
      • Long-term follow-up studies of cell and gene therapies
      • Mainstreaming Cell & Gene Therapies
    • Central Nervous System
      • A mind for digital therapeutics
      • Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
      • Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
      • Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
      • Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
      • ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
    • Glycomics
    • Infectious Diseases
      • Antimicrobial Resistance
      • Considerations for strengthening vaccine development
      • COVID-19 vaccine trials
      • COVID-19 vaccines: Post-authorisation safety surveillance
      • HIV
      • The value of dynamic transmission models
    • NASH
      • The voice of NASH investigators
    • Obesity
      • Addressing obesity's impact across the disease spectrum
      • Trends and challenges in obesity research and clinical trials
      • Obesity and beyond: embracing multi-indication potential during clinical development
      • Survey report: How today’s obesity developers are navigating a multi-indication landscape
    • Oncology
      • ICON survey report: Innovation in Oncology
      • De-risking clinical development of precision medicines in oncology
      • Advances in imaging biomarkers: Estimating drug efficacy with tumour growth rate modelling
      • The future of oncology biosimilars
    • Paediatrics
      • Paediatric Risk Assessment Map
    • Respiratory
    • Rare and orphan diseases
      • Advanced therapies for rare diseases
      • Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
      • Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
      • Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
      • Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
      • Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
      • Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
      • Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
      • The key to remarkable rare disease registries
      • Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
  • Transforming Trials
    • Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
    • Demystifying the Systematic Literature Reviews
    • Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
    • From bottlenecks to breakthroughs
    • Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
    • More than monitoring
    • Optimising biotech funding
    • Adaptive clinical trials
      • Adaptive Design: The Faster Path to Market
    • Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
    • Decentralised clinical trials
      • Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
      • Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
      • Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
      • Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
    • eCOA implementation
    • Blended solutions insights
      • Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
      • How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
      • The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
      • Embracing a blended operating model
      • Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
    • Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
    • Improving pharma R&D efficiency
    • Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
    • Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
    • Partnership insights
      • Exploring partnership culture and its impact on outsourcing and operational strategy
    • Risk Based Quality Management
    • Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
  • Value Based Healthcare
    • Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
    • US payers and PROs
    • Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
    • Cardiovascular Medical Devices
    • CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
    • COVID-19 navigating global market access
    • Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
    • Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
    • Health technology assessment
    • Perspectives from US payers
    • ICER’s impact on payer decision making
    • Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
    • Medical communications in early phase product development
    • Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
    • Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
    • Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
    • Precision Medicine
    • RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
    • Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
    • The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
    • The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
    • Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
  • Blog
  • Videos
  • Webinar Channel

Connect with us

  • Contact us
  • Submit proposal request
  • Update Email Preferences
  • Global office locator
  • ICON on social media

Related Information

Solutions

Early Phase Services

Factsheet

Early Phase Development Factsheet

Factsheet

ICON Clinical Pharmacology Fact Sheet

Site Branding
    ICON plc
  • Contact
  • About ICON
  • Results & Reports
For Clients
  • Therapeutics
  • Solutions
  • Insights
  • Technologies
  • Content preferences
  • Office locations
ICON for
  • Patients
  • Volunteers
  • Investigators
  • Jobs & Careers
  • Investors
  • Suppliers
News & Events
  • Press releases
  • Mediakit
  • Events
  • Webinars
Socials
  • Linkedin
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube

Legal Footer

  • © 2026 ICON plc
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy & Data
  • Cookies
How can we help?
  • All
  • Website
Popular search terms:
  • Biotech
  • Cell and Gene Therapies
  • Consulting
  • Early Clinical
  • Medical Device
  • Oncology
  • Rare & Orphan Diseases
  • Real World Evidence
  • Site & Patient Recruitment
  • Strategic Solutions
  • Regulatory Intelligence