Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are drugs which combine very potent payloads with a highly selective antibody which guides the payload to its intended target. The first approval of an ADC treatment was in 2000 but the number of ADCs on the market remains low. Approximately 13 ADCs are in use, mainly in oncology. The complexity of developing this type of molecule for therapeutic purposes has limited the number of ADCs up to now. However, that is changing as a new generation of ADCs are being developed thanks to improvements in the structural design, primarily in the linker between the antibody and the payload. In this article we look at some of the challenges of typical bioanalytical ADC assays and some recent developments in the area.
Finding the right bioanalytical methods
Assessing the pharmacokinetics (PK) and metabolism of ADCs requires robust and accurate bioanalytical methods. The nature of the drug makes this challenging, as several potential PK analytes may need to be quantified such as the conjugated and free antibody, a small molecule toxin, linker and several combinations of these. Further adding to the complexity, ADCs are heterogenous in structure, unstable by design and their individual components have very different concentrations in the circulation.
Multiple bioanalytical assays are usually needed for ADCs, and for PK typically a series of methods have to be developed. In the simplest form at least three assays may be necessary; one assay for the ADC (antibody linked to at least one cytotoxic payload), one for total antibody (including those without payload) and an assay for free payload, which together provides information on the degree of payload release. Getting a full picture of the biological situation may be more complicated. Some payloads can undergo metabolism both after release and while still attached to the antibody, and many of the linker molecules can be cleaved in different ways under physiological conditions. This can result in several different analytes composed of free payload, or its metabolite, connected to linker fragments. In addition, determining the concentrations of ADC-containing metabolised payload may be required depending on the therapeutic activity of each of the ADC-related molecules.
Drug-to-antibody ratio and ligand binding assays
Complexity further increases since the ADC usually is a heterogeneous group of molecules with different numbers of payloads per antibody rather than a single molecule. This number is often referred to as the drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) and it may affect the binding capacity of an ADC and therefore its response in ligand binding assays (LBAs). Newer generation ADCs include molecules of even greater structural complexity, such as bispecific ADCs for dual antigen binding and ADCs containing multiple types of payloads.
Advances in bioanalytical approaches
The bioanalytical platforms required for the different PK assessments varies. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based methods (LC-MS/MS) are often used for (small molecule) cytotoxin PK assays. LBAs typically measure the antibody PK. Recent major advances have made LC-MS/MS a reliable complementary technique for protein bioanalysis and nowadays LC-MS/MS-based approaches can also be used for most antibody analyses. An immunocapture step can be added to selectively extract the molecule(s) of interest from the biological sample. This is usually referred to as a hybrid LBA-LC-MS/MS assay.
Assessing immunogenicity should be carried out by measuring anti-drug antibodies (ADAs). This sometimes means using a number of different assays with their own specificity against the relevant domains of the ADC. Critical reagents are required for most of these assays and the assays will only be as good as the quality of the available reagents. LBAs are typically used for ADA assessment, but recently hybrid LBA-LC-MS/MS approaches have also been explored. These are a useful complementary technique as they can provide semi-quantitative concentrations of ADA isotypes.
Conclusion
Given the complexity of performing bioanalysis for ADCs, designing a suitable analytical approach is complicated. The biology of the ADC in question, the goals of the drug development and the characteristics of the assays must all be considered as part of this crucial step.
This blog is adapted from the article Finding your way in ADC bioanalytics.
ICON has extensive experience with ADC assays, including LC-MS/MS, LBA PK, and ADA methods for ADC drug development. Find out more or reach out directly.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Decoding AI in software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Software as a medical device (SaMD)
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Representation and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Prioritising patient-centred research for regulatory approval
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
-
Blended solutions insights
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
How investments in supply of CRAs is better than competing with the demand for CRAs
-
The evolution of FSP: not just for large pharma
-
Embracing a blended operating model
-
Observations in outsourcing: Survey results show a blended future
-
Clinical trials in Japan: An enterprise growth and management strategy
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Behind Biotech: Stories of science and resilience
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Integrating openness and precision for competitive advantage
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel